If you've got #uBlockOrigin in #Firefox, is it worth having #PrivacyBadger as well, or does one of them do all the same things as the other? If so, which one?
@alfred browser is #Firefox 68.0.2 64-bit (#ABrowser distribution) running on #Trisquel 8.0 (updated today). I'm running #uBlockOrigin 1.24.2 (disabled for Libranet.de) and #NoScript 11.0.9 (with libranet.de set to "trusted").
@aktivismoEstasMiaLuo@randynose in the meantime, it sounds like you folks might need a script blocker like #NoScript. You sometimes need to allow scripts from the primary domain to read the article, but it still filters out all the third-party scripts that usually serve ads, trackers, Cloudflare etc. I also use #uBlockOrigin, and other folks recommend #uMatrix and #LibreJS.
@bhaugen@ldubost I'm using #ABrowser on Trisquel 8 (basically deblobbed #Ubuntu). ABrowser is basically #Firefox, minus all the proprietary bits and anti-features, plus any privacy protection turned on by default. Current version is 63.0.3, but I've tried to use Cryptpad many time on previous versions, no joy. I also have #uBlockOrigin and #NoScript installed, but I've tried disabling them both when looking at Cryptpads, no luck.
@Ninjatrappeur@david_ross hmm. Is it possible that the same thing that allows #uBlockOrigin to stop #WebRTC leaking private data could also stop sevice based on it from working properly? Especially in combination with #NoScript?