@fitheach the public funding argument is a curious one. The counter-argument is that only UK taxpayers fund the #BBC so only they are entitled to free access. Possible solutions include a clause in copyright treaties that all publicly-funded media is exempt from copyright, or has to be under a #CC license. Or a global (or per-language) public interest media fund that all governments contribute to.
@null#ProPublica. #HuffPost. #RadioNZ (livestream available and many shows now available as podcasts) #ABC (Australian), #BBC, and other public broadcasters now available to a global audience. But I'm pretty sceptical of the whole concept of "the news". As #NeilPostman wrote about its origins and biases in 'Amusing Ourselves to Death', it's form derived from the telegraph, and however impartial it aims to be, it tends to distort the relative importance of information based on how "new" it is.
@jackyan we're also supposed to believe that #RT is purely a propaganda channel - even though we're told "80%" of what they broadcast is good journalism - because it's funded by the Russian state. But the #BBC is not a propaganda channel, and the 20% they get wrong (eg Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction") is just innocent mistakes #YeahRight. IMHO both are state propaganda channels, whose journalists squeeze in good journalism whenever the state that funds them doesn't have skin in the game.
@mcscx@cypnk I also remember the smell from working on electronics in high school, we often reused a lot of 1970s era surplus components and circuit boards, I think British Telecom donated a lot of them as where I lived we had an unusually advanced (for UK) electronic telephone exchange which was upgraded several times, as a lot of audio from #ColdWar#radiomonitoring and #surveillance went through the region due to the #BBC#Caversham Monitoring service being down the road!