Federati Nu: Federated N-series GNU Social
  • Login
It's "All Of Us For All Of Us" Or We're On Our Own

  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:53:55 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
    Remote profile options...
    "In the 1980s people stopped sharing machines ...
    http://qttr.at/20bz
    In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:53:55 UTC from quitter.se permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:56:06 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      ... probably for the same reason that people in decades prior stopped taking buses and streetcars and instead drove cars." - Paul Ford
      In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:56:06 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:57:17 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      Now we are going back to sharing machines that we are told exist in "the cloud". Could a return to mass transit be the future of transport?
      In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:57:17 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:59:22 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey for the analogy to hold, all mass transit systems worldwide should be privatised first

      In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 22:59:22 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:11:11 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus privatization of public transport infrastructure has been underway for decades in this country, leading to
      http://qttr.at/20c2
      In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:11:11 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:18:58 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey and that's precisely why I used the word "worldwide". Let me explain: cloud computing has been pushed on us because it is profitable at a global scale (you can pay Amazon for an AWS instance regardless of your location); to achieve the same level of global profitability, mass transit systems should be privatised worldwide, by a small group of companies, given the hyper local nature of mass transit.

      In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:18:58 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:43:05 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus the point of the analogy is the shift from PC back to shared computing might actually be good, only the private ownership is bad
      In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:43:05 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:43:55 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus if we replaced #Google and #FarceBook with entities run like #Wikipedia and #Archive.org would the 'centralization' be a problem?
      In conversation Friday, 24-Nov-2017 23:43:55 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 00:47:24 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey I get it, and I agree with you. I just wanted to point out that global private ownership is a key difference between cloud infrastructures and mass transit ones. besides this, I am all for mass transit

      In conversation Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 00:47:24 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 00:50:04 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey centralized institutions will always suffer from "single failure point" problems, not to mention politics. I'd much prefer a decentralised replacement for both

      In conversation Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 00:50:04 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 01:30:42 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus but isn't this also an argument against mass transit and for personal vehicles?
      In conversation Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 01:30:42 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 01:50:11 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus taken to an extreme it even becomes an argument against public roads (private roading ownership being more 'decentalized') ...
      In conversation Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 01:50:11 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 01:52:20 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus ... or even an argument against roads as a single point of failure; and for flying cars (ie private jets) as more 'decentralized'
      In conversation Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 01:52:20 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 12:31:09 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey my bad, I should have expressed myself better. To me "decentralised" means every single community gets to both control and enjoy the local implementation of a given system, regardless of how other communities organise themselves. Private cars are not decentralised in this sense, as private ownership prevents the community at large from benefitting from them. Mass transit, on the contrary, grants access to all

      In conversation Saturday, 25-Nov-2017 12:31:09 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:33:56 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus this is a fair definition of 'decentralized', but I can't see how the rest of your argument logically follows from it.
      In conversation Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:33:56 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:35:32 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus communities don't get to control the local implementation of mass transit, it's determined by centralised transit authorities ...
      In conversation Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:35:32 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:35:50 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus ... or in some cases private companies.
      In conversation Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:35:50 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:38:47 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus each household's private vehicles implement the RDT (Road Transport Protocol) independent of other how others households do it...
      In conversation Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:38:47 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:40:00 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus ... so it neatly fits your definition of 'decentralised', no?
      In conversation Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:40:00 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:44:46 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey hey :)
      > so it neatly fits your definition of 'decentralised', no?
      - not really, as private ownership is not benefiting the community as a whole, but only those who actually own the cars (though car polling and car sharing schemes sometimes alleviate this problem)

      In conversation Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:44:46 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:54:20 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey so we have two parallel situations:
      - private cars are decentralized but do not benefit the community
      - public transport is centralized but benefits the community

      An ideal scenario would be a decentralized transportation method that benefits the community, something we could achieve through cooperative ownership.

      In conversation Friday, 15-Dec-2017 10:54:20 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 00:51:58 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus there's nothing in your definition of 'decentralized' about "benefiting the community". That's a totally separate issue
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 00:51:58 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 00:53:15 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus or maybe we could just accept the self-evident fact that centralized can sometimes be better than decentralized?
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 00:53:15 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 00:57:14 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus after all centralization vs. decentralization is only one criteria. There's also public vs. private, democratic vs. elite etc
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 00:57:14 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:02:44 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus coming back to the distribution of computing, which is where we started this discussion ...
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:02:44 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:04:06 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus what we're looking at is the distribution of two different things; processing and responsibility. The "cloud" centralizes both
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:04:06 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:05:35 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus "self-hosting" using leased access to datacentres decentralizes sysadmin responsibility while still centralizing processing
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:05:35 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:06:45 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus self-hosting using one's own hardware decentralizes both processing and sysadmin responsibilities, but with a loss of resilience
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:06:45 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:08:20 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus if your hardware fails (or your sysadmin skills) your services go down and/or data is lost. Datacentres provide many redundancies
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:08:20 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:09:52 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus so a publicly-owned, democratically-run datacentre might be a better model than full decentralization (self-hosting at home)
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:09:52 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:11:02 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus how many people, even among passionate software freedom geeks, self-host on their own hardware and pipe? Not many, if any
      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 01:11:02 UTC permalink
    • Antanicus (antanicus@social.coop)'s status on Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 08:03:26 UTC Antanicus Antanicus
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to

      @strypey
      A fair point, but only if you consider "traditional" approaches to self hosting. What happens if we add IPFS to the mix? Wouldn't that guarantee at least some form of redundancy and safety?

      In conversation Wednesday, 20-Dec-2017 08:03:26 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 21-Dec-2017 23:33:47 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus if it results in more of the data hosting and processing happening on premises, maybe.
      In conversation Thursday, 21-Dec-2017 23:33:47 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 21-Dec-2017 23:35:39 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Antanicus
      @antanicus but tools like #IPFS would be just as useful for distributing storage and processing between cooperatively-owned datacentres
      In conversation Thursday, 21-Dec-2017 23:35:39 UTC permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Federati Nu: Federated N-series GNU Social is a social network, courtesy of Federati Networks. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.0-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Federati Nu: Federated N-series GNU Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.

Switch to mobile site layout.