Conversation
Notices
-
Tobias Dausend (throgh@gnusocial.federated-networks.org)'s status on Monday, 06-Aug-2018 09:32:58 UTC Tobias Dausend Well another discussion about #Privaxy and #Security is started regarding #Mozilla and the browser #Firefox. But what's the problem? The implementation of DNS over the protocol HTTPS but just with the usage of the company Cloudflare (more to read here: https://blog.ungleich.ch/en-us/cms/blog/2018/08/04/mozillas-new-dns-resolution-is-dangerous/).
And what's the point? Just another centralized aspect with all your visited content in your browser being accessible throughout Cloudflare and no further note where those data is saved in details and what parts exactly. Nothing to argument: The feature itself may be a good one. But not in this way and without further possibilities for configuration. And there is another example about this pragmatism in modern days: People argue that those configuration can be changed throughout "about:config". Sorry, what? Most users have never heard about these possibilities. So this is a lazy compromise. #Stop-Playing-Bullshit-
Tobias Dausend (throgh@gnusocial.federated-networks.org)'s status on Monday, 06-Aug-2018 10:49:23 UTC Tobias Dausend @cirk2 Thanks for the addition. :) Therefore my thoughts and I hope there will be some interface. For myself I would have no further problem configure that. But many users have never heard more from "about:config" besides their "profile" to be modified. -
Tobias Dausend (throgh@gnusocial.federated-networks.org)'s status on Monday, 06-Aug-2018 10:54:45 UTC Tobias Dausend @cirk2 Would be also a nice idea, so more experienced users have also the way to modify this. In the end there has to be some options within the graphical user interface. -
Tobias Dausend (throgh@gnusocial.federated-networks.org)'s status on Monday, 06-Aug-2018 13:19:12 UTC Tobias Dausend With a big sigh and as an addition to this previous comment: No this is no further "declaration of war" against #Mozilla. But what's the option? Choosing the lesser evil at last? That's the big problem while #Mozilla is explicit not listening. At any times when trying to spread more "love" again for the project and the foundation they do something really dumb. For example? Integration of DRM. Many more little points on the list and it's not about getting the people to use "Google Chrome". It's about really thinking WHAT the personal freedom is valuable and why we just can't do without more proprietary services in the end. Just dealing with the "lesser evil" is already the lazy compromise.
And there are more browser-projects done by independent groups and developers. Perhaps it is time we think about using them instead just some "big names" everybody is using? -
rugk (rugk@social.wiuwiu.de)'s status on Monday, 06-Aug-2018 16:53:41 UTC rugk @throgh Sure, then do argue to change the default configuration: https://social.wiuwiu.de/web/statuses/100504215327276263
Tobias Dausend repeated this. -
Tobias Dausend (throgh@gnusocial.federated-networks.org)'s status on Monday, 06-Aug-2018 18:35:44 UTC Tobias Dausend @rugk Good one, but perhaps there would be the alternative to select different servers within the GUI or to have different implementations selected.
-